Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Main subject
Language
Year range
1.
Front Psychol ; 12: 625506, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2288548

ABSTRACT

Background: Burnout is a stress-induced syndrome considered to be closely related to work. Although social support could relief burnout syndrome, its effect on learning burnout in medical students remains unclear. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the association between learning burnout and social support in Chinese medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to students who participated in online learning in a medical college in Wuhan during the COVID-19 epidemic. We used the Lian version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) to assess learning burnout and the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) to assess social support. Chi-square tests were used to analyze factors associated with burnout. Independent t-test and multiple logistic regression were explored to analyze the relationship between social support and burnout. Results: A total of 684 students have completed the survey (response rate: 30.9%), of which 315 (46.12%) met standard criteria for learning burnout. Multiple logistic regression analysis has revealed that seniors, low family income and low social support were significant predictors of learning burnout (χ2 = 41.983, p < 0.001). After adjusting for the grade and family income, there was a significant and relevant association between social support and learning burnout (OR = 0.937; 95% CI: 0.905-0.970; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Learning burnout was highly prevalent in medical students at our college. Senior students and low family income might be risk factors for learning burnout. Social support, especially subjective support and utilization of support might play a protective role in reducing the risk of learning burnout.

2.
Guillaume Butler-Laporte; Gundula Povysil; Jack Kosmicki; Elizabeth T Cirulli; Theodore Drivas; Simone Furini; Chadi Saad; Axel Schmidt; Pawel Olszewski; Urszula Korotko; Mathieu Quinodoz; Elifnaz Celik; Kousik Kundu; Klaudia Walter; Junghyung Jung; Amy D Stockwell; Laura G Sloofman; Alexander W Charney; Daniel Jordan; Noam Beckmann; Bartlomiej Przychodzen; Timothy Chang; Tess D Pottinger; Ning Shang; Fabian Brand; Francesca Fava; Francesca Mari; Karolina Chwialkowska; Magdalena Niemira; Szymon Pula; J Kenneth Baillie; Alex Stuckey; Andrea Ganna; Konrad J Karczewski; Kumar Veerapen; Mathieu Bourgey; Guillaume Bourque; Robert JM Eveleigh; Vincenzo Forgetta; David Morrison; David Langlais; Mark Lathrop; Vincent Mooser; Tomoko Nakanishi; Robert Frithiof; Michael Hultstrom; Miklos Lipcsey; Yanara Marincevic-Zuniga; Jessica Nordlund; Kelly M Schiabor Barrett; William Lee; Alexandre Bolze; Simon White; Stephen Riffle; Francisco Tanudjaja; Efren Sandoval; Iva Neveux; Shaun Dabe; Nicolas Casadei; Susanne Motameny; Manal Alaamery; Salam Massadeh; Nora Aljawini; Mansour S Almutairi; Yaseen M Arab; Saleh A Alqahtan; Fawz S Al Harthi; Amal Almutairi; Fatima Alqubaishi; Sarah Alotaibi; Albandari Binowayn; Ebtehal A Alsolm; Hadeel El Bardisy; Mohammad Fawzy; - COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative; - DeCOI Host Genetics Group; - GEN-COVID Multicenter Study; - GenOMICC Consortium; - Japan COVID-19 Task Force; - Regeneron Genetics Center; Daniel H Geschwind; Stephanie Arteaga; Alexis Stephens; Manish J Butte; Paul C Boutros; Takafumi N Yamaguchi; Shu Tao; Stefan Eng; Timothy Sanders; Paul J Tung; Michael E Broudy; Yu Pan; Alfredo Gonzalez; Nikhil Chavan; Ruth Johnson; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Brian Yaspan; Sandra Smieszek; Carlo Rivolta; Stephanie Bibert; Pierre-Yves Bochud; Maciej Dabrowski; Pawel Zawadzki; Mateusz Sypniewski; El?bieta Kaja; Pajaree Chariyavilaskul; Voraphoj Nilaratanakul; Nattiya Hirankarn; Vorasuk Shotelersuk; Monnat Pongpanich; Chureerat Phokaew; Wanna Chetruengchai; Yosuke Kawai; Takanori Hasegawa; Tatsuhiko Naito; Ho Namkoong; Ryuya Edahiro; Akinori Kimura; Seishi Ogawa; Takanori Kanai; Koichi Fukunaga; Yukinori Okada; Seiya Imoto; Satoru Miyano; Serghei Mangul; Malak S Abedalthagafi; Hugo Zeberg; Joseph J Grzymski; Nicole L Washington; Stephan Ossowski; Kerstin U Ludwig; Eva C Schulte; Olaf Riess; Marcin Moniuszko; Miroslaw Kwasniewski; Hamdi Mbarek; Said I Ismail; Anurag Verma; David B Goldstein; Krzysztof Kiryluk; Alessandra Renieri; Manuel Ferreira; J Brent Richards.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.03.28.22273040

ABSTRACT

Host genetics is a key determinant of COVID-19 outcomes. Previously, the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative genome-wide association study used common variants to identify multiple loci associated with COVID-19 outcomes. However, variants with the largest impact on COVID-19 outcomes are expected to be rare in the population. Hence, studying rare variants may provide additional insights into disease susceptibility and pathogenesis, thereby informing therapeutics development. Here, we combined whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing from 21 cohorts across 12 countries and performed rare variant exome-wide burden analyses for COVID-19 outcomes. In an analysis of 5,048 severe disease cases and 571,009 controls, we observed that carrying a rare deleterious variant in the SARS-CoV-2 sensor toll-like receptor TLR7 (on chromosome X) was associated with a 5.3-fold increase in severe disease (95% CI: 2.75-10.05, p=5.41x10-7). These results further support TLR7 as a genetic determinant of severe disease and suggest that larger studies on rare variants influencing COVID-19 outcomes could provide additional insights.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
3.
Environmental Research Letters ; 16(9), 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1370345

ABSTRACT

Air pollution exposure depends not only on outdoor but also on indoor air quality and human activities. The outbreak of coronavirus in 2019 occurred close to the Spring Festival in China, when many rural-to-urban workers moved to their hometowns, resulting in increased household (HH) consumption of solid fuels for space heating in the rural north. In this study, field measurements of HH PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic size ⩽2.5 μm) from a rural village were performed to evaluate changes in indoor, outdoor, and total exposure during the quarantine. Both indoor and outdoor PM2.5 were, as expected, higher during the heating period than during the non-heating period, resulting in much more exposure during the heating season. Indoor exposure accounted for up to 87% and 95% of the total PM2.5 exposure during the non-heating and heating periods, respectively. The contributions of indoor exposure associated with internal sources were 46% and 66%, respectively. Indoor coal combustion resulted in an increment of about 62 ± 12 μg m−3 in indoor PM2.5 exposure. Due to the quarantine, the indoor-originated PM2.5 exposure increased by 4 μg m−3 compared to that during the heating period before the lockdown. In comparison with the exposure before the quarantine during the heating period, the outdoor exposure decreased by 5 μg m−3 during the quarantine, which was mainly attributable to much less time spent outdoors, although the outdoor PM2.5 levels increased from 86 ± 49 μg m−3 to 104 ± 85 μg m−3. However, the overall exposure increased by 13 μg m−3 during the quarantine, resulting from the changes in outdoor exposure (−5 μg m−3), outdoor-originated indoor PM2.5 exposure (+9 μg m−3), PM2.5 from indoor sources before the quarantine (+5 μg m−3), and quarantine-induced indoor PM2.5 increments (+4 μg m−3). The increase in air pollution exposure during quarantine deepened concerns about the issue of HH air pollution and the clean HH energy transition actions required to eliminate traditional solid fuels.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL